James Cuda is an entrepreneur and artist from Silicon Valley who leads Procreate as CEO. He blasted generative AI in a recent interview and said the company would never include it in the popular digital painting application. According to Cuda, Gen AI is an abomination that can compromise the creativity and individuality of artists. The Procreate CEO founded the software to guard the creative integrity of human expression.
What Is Gen AI?
It is a type of artificial intelligence that creates new textual data, new visuals, or new code. It is developed based on enormous datasets of existing content, hence being used to create new and original content.
Why Is Cuda Against Gen AI?
Cuda believes that Gen AI would wipe out the creativity and originality of artists. The speaker contends that the integration of technology in the production of artwork may result in the indistinguishability of human-created art.
Cuda also presents an argument avowing that Gen AI also poses a threat to the livelihood of artists. According to him, Gen AI could potentially create cheaper, more accessible art, potentially displacing beauty artisans and reducing the demand for traditional art.
Procreate’s Commitment To Human Creativity
Procreate is digital painting software used by millions of artists around the world. It was developed to assist artists in creating beautiful and authentic work.
Cuda is committed to preserving the app’s integrity, if you could call it that, to be an aid to human expression. He had previously stated that the company would never implement Gen AI in the app.
The Future Of Gen AI And Art
The future of Gen AI seems bleak, just like it is for art. No agreement exists on whether Gen AI is a plus or a minus.
Others consider Gen AI a mighty instrument for exploding creativity. They suggest that with the help of Gen AI, artists will open up new ideas, and hence, they’ll create new types of art.
Critics argue that Gen AI could potentially devalue human creativity and originality, creating art that closely resembles human-created works.
Conclusion
Procreate CEO James Cuda has decried generative AI, promising that his company’s popular digital painting app will never include it. He believes that, in some ways, Gen AI can be an invasion of the artist’s creativity. Hence, the company will be fully devoted to safeguarding the integrity of Procreate as a tool for human expression. The future of Gen AI and art is uncertain. Gen AI is neither good nor bad.
